In partnership with
Most people overcomplicate LLM selection.
They jump between model leaderboards, watch comparison videos, skim Twitter takes, and still end up confused.
Not because the models are confusing, but because they’re asking the wrong question.
They’re asking:
“Which LLM is the best?”
But the real question is:
“Which LLM is the best for the workload, constraints, and system I’m building?”
Once you make that shift, the noise disappears.
Patterns emerge.
And model selection becomes a repeatable, almost mechanical decision.
Let’s break down a practical framework for evaluating LLMs properly:
1. First: Understand Why Models Behave Differently
This is the layer most people skip, then wonder why GPT, Claude, Grok, and DeepSeek respond so differently to the same prompt.
Three forces shape every model:
1) Architecture → how the model thinks
All transformer models share the same skeleton, but vary on:
Dense vs Mixture-of-Experts
Dense = all neurons fire (GPT, Claude)
MoE = routed to expert subnetworks (Gemini, Mistral, Llama, DeepSeek)Router systems
Newer models like GPT-5 automatically pick a “fast” or “deep reasoning” model based on query complexity.Context window differences
Anything from 128K to 10M tokens.
Architecture determines speed, cost, and reasoning depth.
2) Training Data → what the model knows
Models differ because their “knowledge mix” differs:
Claude: curated code + structured documents → precise, technical
Gemini: text + video + audio → strongest native multimodal
GPT-5: broad internet + books → reliable generalist
Grok: real-time X/Twitter stream → up-to-the-minute awareness
DeepSeek: heavy math + bilingual corpora → symbolic reasoning beast
Llama: social + web + images → balanced multimodal foundation
Training data determines expertise.
3) Alignment → how the model behaves
This is where “model personalities” are created:
RLHF / DPO → preferred behavior
Constitutional alignment (Anthropic) → cautious and principled
Minimal filtering (Grok) → more raw
Preference-optimization (DeepSeek) → concise, correctness-first
Alignment determines tone, refusal behavior, verbosity, and safety profile.
Understanding these three layers helps you predict output quality instead of guessing.
2. The Most Important Factor: Licensing
This is where LLM selection goes from “fun” to “real engineering.”
There are three licensing categories:
1) Closed-API (GPT-5, Claude, Gemini, Grok)
Highest average quality
Zero operational overhead
Limited customization
Data leaves your environment
Terms can change anytime
Great for speed, but with trade-offs.
2) Open-Weight (Llama, Kimmi K2, DeepSeek variants)
Downloadable weights
But with constraints (e.g., user limits, competitive restrictions)
Good balance of control + performance
Many startups fail to read this fine print.
3) True Open Source / OSI (Mistral, Falcon, Quinn variants)
Apache / MIT / BSD
Fully self-hostable
Fine-tunable without friction
Enterprise-friendly with compliance needs
If you need control, privacy, or cost efficiency at scale, this is your lane.
3. The Practical Decision Framework
Step 1 — Choose the license before the model
Ask:
Does your data include PII/PHI?
Do you need fine-tuning?
Do you need on-prem?
Do you have usage scale that makes token pricing painful?
Are you a small team that needs speed over customization?
Just answering those five questions will eliminate 70% of models.
Step 2 — Match by task complexity
Here's a clean breakdown:
Task Complexity | Model Match |
|---|---|
Simple tasks (FAQs, classification) | Mistral Small, DeepSeek Fast |
Medium tasks (content, rewriting, basic coding) | GPT-5 Fast, Mistral Medium |
Complex reasoning (math, research, logic-heavy workflows) | Claude Sonnet 4.5, GPT-5 Reasoning, Grok 4, DeepSeek-R |
Agentic or multi-step workflows | Kimmi K2, Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
Step 3 — Match by context window
Under 128K → any model works
128K–1M → GPT-5, Claude, DeepSeek
1–2M → Gemini Pro, Grok Fast
Up to 10M → Llama 4 Scout
Context needs alone often eliminate half your options.
Step 4 — Match by deployment model
API: GPT-5, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek
Self-hosted: Llama, Mistral, Kimmi, DeepSeek-OpenWeight
Edge/local: quantized 7B models (Mist / Llama variants)
Your infra dictates your model more than your benchmarks do.
A quick word from our sponsor
Shoppers are adding to cart for the holidays
Over the next year, Roku predicts that 100% of the streaming audience will see ads. For growth marketers in 2026, CTV will remain an important “safe space” as AI creates widespread disruption in the search and social channels. Plus, easier access to self-serve CTV ad buying tools and targeting options will lead to a surge in locally-targeted streaming campaigns.
Read our guide to find out why growth marketers should make sure CTV is part of their 2026 media mix.
4. Build an Evaluation Loop (Most Teams Skip This Part)
High-performing teams evaluate models the same way they test software—systematically.
Create a domain-specific test set (20–50 prompts minimum)
Use real data:
support tickets
customer emails
contracts
code snippets
long documents
edge cases
sloppy user queries with typos
Score each model by:
Accuracy
Helpfulness
Structured output compliance
Latency
Use AI judges
With temperature 0 + clear rubrics.
Consistent, fast, reliable.
Re-run monthly
Models update silently.
The ecosystem moves weekly.
Continuous evaluation > one-time selection.
5. The Mindset Shift That Changes Everything
Once you internalize this, you stop guessing:
Choosing an LLM is not about picking a model.
It’s about architecting a system.
The system =
License + Architecture + Training Data + Alignment + Context + Deployment + Evaluation + Cost
When you choose models with this lens:
you avoid vendor lock-in
you control cost
you improve reliability
you ship faster
your agents break less
your workflows become predictable
This is how top AI teams operate.
Not with hype—with systems thinking.
✉️ Enjoyed this issue?
If this helped clarify how to choose the right LLM for your product, forward it to a friend who’s experimenting with AI tools, or share it on X/LinkedIn with your biggest takeaway. Your share helps the Playbook grow.
👉 abhisAIplaybook.com