In partnership with
Most people overcomplicate LLM selection.
They jump between model leaderboards, watch comparison videos, skim Twitter takes, and still end up confused.
Not because the models are confusing, but because they’re asking the wrong question.
They’re asking:
“Which LLM is the best?”
But the real question is:
“Which LLM is the best for the workload, constraints, and system I’m building?”
Once you make that shift, the noise disappears.
Patterns emerge.
And model selection becomes a repeatable, almost mechanical decision.
Let’s break down a practical framework for evaluating LLMs properly:
1. First: Understand Why Models Behave Differently
This is the layer most people skip, then wonder why GPT, Claude, Grok, and DeepSeek respond so differently to the same prompt.
Three forces shape every model:
1) Architecture → how the model thinks
All transformer models share the same skeleton, but vary on:
Dense vs Mixture-of-Experts
Dense = all neurons fire (GPT, Claude)
MoE = routed to expert subnetworks (Gemini, Mistral, Llama, DeepSeek)Router systems
Newer models like GPT-5 automatically pick a “fast” or “deep reasoning” model based on query complexity.Context window differences
Anything from 128K to 10M tokens.
Architecture determines speed, cost, and reasoning depth.
2) Training Data → what the model knows
Models differ because their “knowledge mix” differs:
Claude: curated code + structured documents → precise, technical
Gemini: text + video + audio → strongest native multimodal
GPT-5: broad internet + books → reliable generalist
Grok: real-time X/Twitter stream → up-to-the-minute awareness
DeepSeek: heavy math + bilingual corpora → symbolic reasoning beast
Llama: social + web + images → balanced multimodal foundation
Training data determines expertise.
3) Alignment → how the model behaves
This is where “model personalities” are created:
RLHF / DPO → preferred behavior
Constitutional alignment (Anthropic) → cautious and principled
Minimal filtering (Grok) → more raw
Preference-optimization (DeepSeek) → concise, correctness-first
Alignment determines tone, refusal behavior, verbosity, and safety profile.
Understanding these three layers helps you predict output quality instead of guessing.
2. The Most Important Factor: Licensing
This is where LLM selection goes from “fun” to “real engineering.”
There are three licensing categories:
1) Closed-API (GPT-5, Claude, Gemini, Grok)
Highest average quality
Zero operational overhead
Limited customization
Data leaves your environment
Terms can change anytime
Great for speed, but with trade-offs.
2) Open-Weight (Llama, Kimmi K2, DeepSeek variants)
Downloadable weights
But with constraints (e.g., user limits, competitive restrictions)
Good balance of control + performance
Many startups fail to read this fine print.
3) True Open Source / OSI (Mistral, Falcon, Quinn variants)
Apache / MIT / BSD
Fully self-hostable
Fine-tunable without friction
Enterprise-friendly with compliance needs
If you need control, privacy, or cost efficiency at scale, this is your lane.